Politics

There is an alternative: what Venezuela can teach us about the banking sector

The year is 2008.  In the US the housing bubble has burst, leaving major financial institutions with a large mess on their hands.  It will always be remembered as a time of failing banks, the ‘credit crunch’, plummeting stock markets and declining trade worldwide.  The causes of the financial meltdown are a complex interplay of forces, but at the core of the issue is Wall Street’s greed and risk-taking, as well as a failure on the part of regulators and the financial market to prevent the situation from exploding.   The end result on the world economy has been nothing short of disastrous.  Since 2008 we have seen too many reports of famine, joblessness and uprisings. (after all, these things tend to be related)

Graffiti, New York City. Photo used under cc licence, courtesy of Jaci Vico

So what steps were taken to “rein in the excesses of Wall Street“?  Well, governments and central banks handed out bailouts to poorly performing financial institutions of a magnitude never seen before.

We have come to normalise the reckless disregard for human life so characteristic of the banking sector.  We could have walked down many different paths to deal with the financial crisis - so what else could we have done?

In Venezuela the government takes a very different approach to the banking sector.  For example, there is a law in place that means that at least 10% of a bank’s lending should support development projects.  President Chávez has recently threatened to nationalise the banks that are not delivering on this.  The Venezuelan government wants to see more loans going to support small farmers rather than just going to big businesses. “Either you finance agricultural production or we will take measures. There is no alternative,” Chávez has said.  And the irrefutable warning, “If you can’t do it, give me the banks.”

Chávez has made similar threats to the commerce sector, having angered the business community by imposing regulations that will guarantee a fixed maximum price on basic consumer goods.  This is to avoid the price of goods being driven up by speculation, the catastrophic effects of which were seen in the Horn of Africa last year.  Speculation on the world food market helped to fuel the widespread famine that endangered millions of people.

Headquarters of Banco Provincial in Caracas – one of the banks threatened with nationalisation. Photo used under cc license, courtesy of Antonio Jordana

Venezuelan businesses have predictably complained about the new price fixing measures, calling them “unviable” for business as usual.  But rather than balking at the first hurdle, Chávez has said he will seek investment from outside the country if the companies are not able to deliver within the new constraints.  It seems that in Venezuela they are unwilling to let big business hold the country to ransom.

Lets take a case study in the UK for comparison - the Royal Bank of Scotland (RBS).  Consider this worrying timeline:

  • 2009: the UK government provides an unprecedented bailout to banks, and now officially owns 84% of RBS
  • 2010: bonuses totalling almost £1 billion were paid to top executives of RBS, despite reporting losses of over £1 billion in the same financial year
  • 2011: the massive drop in the price of RBS stocks meant that UK taxpayers lost £26 billion on the value of their investment
  • 2012: there was much controversy over the £1 million bonus offered to the RBS Chief Executive.

Luckily for the UK taxpayer, the RBS Chief Exec turned down the £1 million bonus following intense pressure.  But the government could have demanded this of him in the first place.  Why didn’t they?  The tired old argument of “we don’t want top people or businesses to leave the country” just doesn’t fly in the face of 2.7 million unemployed people in the UK and cuts to much needed welfare payments and disability allowances.

If Venezuela can teach us anything, let it be that:

  • It is possible to take a stand against ugly business practices
  • It is possible to expect our banking and commercial sectors to make a positive contribution to the world
  • There is no better time than right now
About these ads

2 thoughts on “There is an alternative: what Venezuela can teach us about the banking sector

  1. Pingback: There is an alternative: what Venezuela can teach us about the banking sector | RevolutionIsEternal | the Mahoney

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s